Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications

Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications

Snake, active contour or deformable active contour has been widely used in medical image segmentation area. In this paper, comparison between Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) snake and Enhanced Distance (ED) snake in segmenting microcalcifications is carried out. The performance is measured based on actua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ICCAIE 2011 - 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics
Main Author: Yasiran S.S.; Jumaat A.K.; Manaf M.; Ibrahim A.; Wan Eny Zarina W.A.R.; Malek A.; Laham M.F.; Mahmud R.
Format: Conference paper
Language:English
Published: 2011
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84858772925&doi=10.1109%2fICCAIE.2011.6162204&partnerID=40&md5=0a9f872311ef3199600299d32dee3545
id 2-s2.0-84858772925
spelling 2-s2.0-84858772925
Yasiran S.S.; Jumaat A.K.; Manaf M.; Ibrahim A.; Wan Eny Zarina W.A.R.; Malek A.; Laham M.F.; Mahmud R.
Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
2011
ICCAIE 2011 - 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics


10.1109/ICCAIE.2011.6162204
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84858772925&doi=10.1109%2fICCAIE.2011.6162204&partnerID=40&md5=0a9f872311ef3199600299d32dee3545
Snake, active contour or deformable active contour has been widely used in medical image segmentation area. In this paper, comparison between Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) snake and Enhanced Distance (ED) snake in segmenting microcalcifications is carried out. The performance is measured based on actual area of the average percentage difference traced by expert radiologists. Results obtained shows that the values of average percentage difference for the GVF and ED snake are 4.3% and 6.68% respectively. These results indicate that the GVF snake has better performance with 95.7%. © 2011 IEEE.


English
Conference paper
All Open Access; Green Open Access
author Yasiran S.S.; Jumaat A.K.; Manaf M.; Ibrahim A.; Wan Eny Zarina W.A.R.; Malek A.; Laham M.F.; Mahmud R.
spellingShingle Yasiran S.S.; Jumaat A.K.; Manaf M.; Ibrahim A.; Wan Eny Zarina W.A.R.; Malek A.; Laham M.F.; Mahmud R.
Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
author_facet Yasiran S.S.; Jumaat A.K.; Manaf M.; Ibrahim A.; Wan Eny Zarina W.A.R.; Malek A.; Laham M.F.; Mahmud R.
author_sort Yasiran S.S.; Jumaat A.K.; Manaf M.; Ibrahim A.; Wan Eny Zarina W.A.R.; Malek A.; Laham M.F.; Mahmud R.
title Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
title_short Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
title_full Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
title_fullStr Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
title_sort Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
publishDate 2011
container_title ICCAIE 2011 - 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics
container_volume
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ICCAIE.2011.6162204
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84858772925&doi=10.1109%2fICCAIE.2011.6162204&partnerID=40&md5=0a9f872311ef3199600299d32dee3545
description Snake, active contour or deformable active contour has been widely used in medical image segmentation area. In this paper, comparison between Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) snake and Enhanced Distance (ED) snake in segmenting microcalcifications is carried out. The performance is measured based on actual area of the average percentage difference traced by expert radiologists. Results obtained shows that the values of average percentage difference for the GVF and ED snake are 4.3% and 6.68% respectively. These results indicate that the GVF snake has better performance with 95.7%. © 2011 IEEE.
publisher
issn
language English
format Conference paper
accesstype All Open Access; Green Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678162288705536

Similar Items