Google Earth's derived digital elevation model: A comparative assessment with Aster and SRTM data

This paper presents a statistical analysis showing additional evidence that Digital Elevation Model (DEM) derived from Google Earth is commendable and has a good correlation with ASTER (Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) and SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) eleva...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Main Author: Rusli N.; Majid M.R.; Din A.H.M.
Format: Conference paper
Language:English
Published: Institute of Physics Publishing 2014
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84902341041&doi=10.1088%2f1755-1315%2f18%2f1%2f012065&partnerID=40&md5=e6894a9f5125d23b58cdd38137df35e3
id 2-s2.0-84902341041
spelling 2-s2.0-84902341041
Rusli N.; Majid M.R.; Din A.H.M.
Google Earth's derived digital elevation model: A comparative assessment with Aster and SRTM data
2014
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
18
1
10.1088/1755-1315/18/1/012065
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84902341041&doi=10.1088%2f1755-1315%2f18%2f1%2f012065&partnerID=40&md5=e6894a9f5125d23b58cdd38137df35e3
This paper presents a statistical analysis showing additional evidence that Digital Elevation Model (DEM) derived from Google Earth is commendable and has a good correlation with ASTER (Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) and SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) elevation data. The accuracy of DEM elevation points from Google Earth was compared against that of DEMs from ASTER and SRTM for flat, hilly and mountainous sections of a pre-selected rural watershed. For each section, a total of 5,000 DEM elevation points were extracted as samples from each type of DEM data. The DEM data from Google Earth and SRTM for flat and hilly sections are strongly correlated with the R2 of 0.791 and 0.891 respectively. Even stronger correlation is shown for the mountainous section where the R2 values between Google Earth's DEM and ASTER's and between Google Earth's DEM and SRTM's DEMs are respectively 0.917 and 0.865. Further accuracy testing was carried out by utilising the DEM dataset to delineate Muar River's watershed boundary using ArcSWAT2009, a hydrological modelling software. The result shows that the percentage differences of the watershed size delineated from Google Earth's DEM compared to those derived from Department of Irrigation and Drainage's data (using 20m-contour topographic map), ASTER and SRTM data are 9.6%, 10.6%, and 7.6% respectively. It is therefore justified to conclude that the DEM derived from Google Earth is relatively as acceptable as DEMs from other sources. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.
Institute of Physics Publishing
17551307
English
Conference paper
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Rusli N.; Majid M.R.; Din A.H.M.
spellingShingle Rusli N.; Majid M.R.; Din A.H.M.
Google Earth's derived digital elevation model: A comparative assessment with Aster and SRTM data
author_facet Rusli N.; Majid M.R.; Din A.H.M.
author_sort Rusli N.; Majid M.R.; Din A.H.M.
title Google Earth's derived digital elevation model: A comparative assessment with Aster and SRTM data
title_short Google Earth's derived digital elevation model: A comparative assessment with Aster and SRTM data
title_full Google Earth's derived digital elevation model: A comparative assessment with Aster and SRTM data
title_fullStr Google Earth's derived digital elevation model: A comparative assessment with Aster and SRTM data
title_full_unstemmed Google Earth's derived digital elevation model: A comparative assessment with Aster and SRTM data
title_sort Google Earth's derived digital elevation model: A comparative assessment with Aster and SRTM data
publishDate 2014
container_title IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
container_volume 18
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1755-1315/18/1/012065
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84902341041&doi=10.1088%2f1755-1315%2f18%2f1%2f012065&partnerID=40&md5=e6894a9f5125d23b58cdd38137df35e3
description This paper presents a statistical analysis showing additional evidence that Digital Elevation Model (DEM) derived from Google Earth is commendable and has a good correlation with ASTER (Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) and SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) elevation data. The accuracy of DEM elevation points from Google Earth was compared against that of DEMs from ASTER and SRTM for flat, hilly and mountainous sections of a pre-selected rural watershed. For each section, a total of 5,000 DEM elevation points were extracted as samples from each type of DEM data. The DEM data from Google Earth and SRTM for flat and hilly sections are strongly correlated with the R2 of 0.791 and 0.891 respectively. Even stronger correlation is shown for the mountainous section where the R2 values between Google Earth's DEM and ASTER's and between Google Earth's DEM and SRTM's DEMs are respectively 0.917 and 0.865. Further accuracy testing was carried out by utilising the DEM dataset to delineate Muar River's watershed boundary using ArcSWAT2009, a hydrological modelling software. The result shows that the percentage differences of the watershed size delineated from Google Earth's DEM compared to those derived from Department of Irrigation and Drainage's data (using 20m-contour topographic map), ASTER and SRTM data are 9.6%, 10.6%, and 7.6% respectively. It is therefore justified to conclude that the DEM derived from Google Earth is relatively as acceptable as DEMs from other sources. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.
publisher Institute of Physics Publishing
issn 17551307
language English
format Conference paper
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677688400510976