Assessing respiratory mechanics using pressure reconstruction method in mechanically ventilated spontaneous breathing patient

Background: Respiratory system modelling can aid clinical decision making during mechanical ventilation (MV) in intensive care. However, spontaneous breathing (SB) efforts can produce entrained "M-wave" airway pressure waveforms that inhibit identification of accurate values for respirator...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Main Author: Damanhuri N.S.; Chiew Y.S.; Othman N.A.; Docherty P.D.; Pretty C.G.; Shaw G.M.; Desaive T.; Chase J.G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ireland Ltd 2016
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84964506172&doi=10.1016%2fj.cmpb.2016.03.025&partnerID=40&md5=81ddd8c07d4e795efc0d387229c50d27
id 2-s2.0-84964506172
spelling 2-s2.0-84964506172
Damanhuri N.S.; Chiew Y.S.; Othman N.A.; Docherty P.D.; Pretty C.G.; Shaw G.M.; Desaive T.; Chase J.G.
Assessing respiratory mechanics using pressure reconstruction method in mechanically ventilated spontaneous breathing patient
2016
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
130

10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.03.025
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84964506172&doi=10.1016%2fj.cmpb.2016.03.025&partnerID=40&md5=81ddd8c07d4e795efc0d387229c50d27
Background: Respiratory system modelling can aid clinical decision making during mechanical ventilation (MV) in intensive care. However, spontaneous breathing (SB) efforts can produce entrained "M-wave" airway pressure waveforms that inhibit identification of accurate values for respiratory system elastance and airway resistance. A pressure wave reconstruction method is proposed to accurately identify respiratory mechanics, assess the level of SB effort, and quantify the incidence of SB effort without uncommon measuring devices or interruption to care. Methods: Data from 275 breaths aggregated from all mechanically ventilated patients at Christchurch Hospital were used in this study. The breath specific respiratory elastance is calculated using a time-varying elastance model. A pressure reconstruction method is proposed to reconstruct pressure waves identified as being affected by SB effort. The area under the curve of the time-varying respiratory elastance (AUC Edrs) are calculated and compared, where unreconstructed waves yield lower AUC Edrs. The difference between the reconstructed and unreconstructed pressure is denoted as a surrogate measure of SB effort. Results: The pressure reconstruction method yielded a median AUC Edrs of 19.21 [IQR: 16.30-22.47] cmH2O s/l. In contrast, the median AUC Edrs for unreconstructed M-wave data was 20.41 [IQR: 16.68-22.81] cmH2O s/l. The pressure reconstruction method had the least variability in AUC Edrs assessed by the robust coefficient of variation (RCV) = 0.04 versus 0.05 for unreconstructed data. Each patient exhibited different levels of SB effort, independent from MV setting, indicating the need for non-invasive, real time assessment of SB effort. Conclusion: A simple reconstruction method enables more consistent real-time estimation of the true, underlying respiratory system mechanics of a SB patient and provides the surrogate of SB effort, which may be clinically useful for clinicians in determining optimal ventilator settings to improve patient care. © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
01692607
English
Article

author Damanhuri N.S.; Chiew Y.S.; Othman N.A.; Docherty P.D.; Pretty C.G.; Shaw G.M.; Desaive T.; Chase J.G.
spellingShingle Damanhuri N.S.; Chiew Y.S.; Othman N.A.; Docherty P.D.; Pretty C.G.; Shaw G.M.; Desaive T.; Chase J.G.
Assessing respiratory mechanics using pressure reconstruction method in mechanically ventilated spontaneous breathing patient
author_facet Damanhuri N.S.; Chiew Y.S.; Othman N.A.; Docherty P.D.; Pretty C.G.; Shaw G.M.; Desaive T.; Chase J.G.
author_sort Damanhuri N.S.; Chiew Y.S.; Othman N.A.; Docherty P.D.; Pretty C.G.; Shaw G.M.; Desaive T.; Chase J.G.
title Assessing respiratory mechanics using pressure reconstruction method in mechanically ventilated spontaneous breathing patient
title_short Assessing respiratory mechanics using pressure reconstruction method in mechanically ventilated spontaneous breathing patient
title_full Assessing respiratory mechanics using pressure reconstruction method in mechanically ventilated spontaneous breathing patient
title_fullStr Assessing respiratory mechanics using pressure reconstruction method in mechanically ventilated spontaneous breathing patient
title_full_unstemmed Assessing respiratory mechanics using pressure reconstruction method in mechanically ventilated spontaneous breathing patient
title_sort Assessing respiratory mechanics using pressure reconstruction method in mechanically ventilated spontaneous breathing patient
publishDate 2016
container_title Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
container_volume 130
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.03.025
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84964506172&doi=10.1016%2fj.cmpb.2016.03.025&partnerID=40&md5=81ddd8c07d4e795efc0d387229c50d27
description Background: Respiratory system modelling can aid clinical decision making during mechanical ventilation (MV) in intensive care. However, spontaneous breathing (SB) efforts can produce entrained "M-wave" airway pressure waveforms that inhibit identification of accurate values for respiratory system elastance and airway resistance. A pressure wave reconstruction method is proposed to accurately identify respiratory mechanics, assess the level of SB effort, and quantify the incidence of SB effort without uncommon measuring devices or interruption to care. Methods: Data from 275 breaths aggregated from all mechanically ventilated patients at Christchurch Hospital were used in this study. The breath specific respiratory elastance is calculated using a time-varying elastance model. A pressure reconstruction method is proposed to reconstruct pressure waves identified as being affected by SB effort. The area under the curve of the time-varying respiratory elastance (AUC Edrs) are calculated and compared, where unreconstructed waves yield lower AUC Edrs. The difference between the reconstructed and unreconstructed pressure is denoted as a surrogate measure of SB effort. Results: The pressure reconstruction method yielded a median AUC Edrs of 19.21 [IQR: 16.30-22.47] cmH2O s/l. In contrast, the median AUC Edrs for unreconstructed M-wave data was 20.41 [IQR: 16.68-22.81] cmH2O s/l. The pressure reconstruction method had the least variability in AUC Edrs assessed by the robust coefficient of variation (RCV) = 0.04 versus 0.05 for unreconstructed data. Each patient exhibited different levels of SB effort, independent from MV setting, indicating the need for non-invasive, real time assessment of SB effort. Conclusion: A simple reconstruction method enables more consistent real-time estimation of the true, underlying respiratory system mechanics of a SB patient and provides the surrogate of SB effort, which may be clinically useful for clinicians in determining optimal ventilator settings to improve patient care. © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
publisher Elsevier Ireland Ltd
issn 01692607
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1814778509884653568