Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model
Watershed characteristics, such as hydraulic length, total area, total river length and perimeter, can be obtained from an analysis of a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). There are many sources of DEM. In this study, DEM were obtained from two different sources, i.e. Jabatan Ukur dan Pemetaan Malaysia...
Published in: | AIP Conference Proceedings |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Conference paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Institute of Physics Inc.
2018
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055593362&doi=10.1063%2f1.5062710&partnerID=40&md5=c5f45e03abf1048cf28db27d9b30f867 |
id |
2-s2.0-85055593362 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85055593362 Abdullah J.; Muhammad N.S.; Osman S.Z.M. Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model 2018 AIP Conference Proceedings 2020 10.1063/1.5062710 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055593362&doi=10.1063%2f1.5062710&partnerID=40&md5=c5f45e03abf1048cf28db27d9b30f867 Watershed characteristics, such as hydraulic length, total area, total river length and perimeter, can be obtained from an analysis of a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). There are many sources of DEM. In this study, DEM were obtained from two different sources, i.e. Jabatan Ukur dan Pemetaan Malaysia (JUPEM) and Google Earth (GE). The attributes examined in this study include the shape and area of a watershed (km2), total river length (km) and hydraulic length (km) of the river using a Geographical Information System (GIS) software. The data from JUPEM was used as the benchmark. It was found that the extracted DEM from GE showed encouraging results. The hydraulic length of the rivers reached very good argument, with only a 3% difference when compared to JUPEM. Additionally, the shape of watershed from GE was slightly smaller than JUPEM, with a difference of about 17%. This study concludes that the DEM from GE can be used as an alternative source of DEM data, especially for studies related to hydrology. © 2018 Author(s). American Institute of Physics Inc. 0094243X English Conference paper |
author |
Abdullah J.; Muhammad N.S.; Osman S.Z.M. |
spellingShingle |
Abdullah J.; Muhammad N.S.; Osman S.Z.M. Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model |
author_facet |
Abdullah J.; Muhammad N.S.; Osman S.Z.M. |
author_sort |
Abdullah J.; Muhammad N.S.; Osman S.Z.M. |
title |
Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model |
title_short |
Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model |
title_full |
Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model |
title_fullStr |
Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model |
title_sort |
Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model |
publishDate |
2018 |
container_title |
AIP Conference Proceedings |
container_volume |
2020 |
container_issue |
|
doi_str_mv |
10.1063/1.5062710 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055593362&doi=10.1063%2f1.5062710&partnerID=40&md5=c5f45e03abf1048cf28db27d9b30f867 |
description |
Watershed characteristics, such as hydraulic length, total area, total river length and perimeter, can be obtained from an analysis of a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). There are many sources of DEM. In this study, DEM were obtained from two different sources, i.e. Jabatan Ukur dan Pemetaan Malaysia (JUPEM) and Google Earth (GE). The attributes examined in this study include the shape and area of a watershed (km2), total river length (km) and hydraulic length (km) of the river using a Geographical Information System (GIS) software. The data from JUPEM was used as the benchmark. It was found that the extracted DEM from GE showed encouraging results. The hydraulic length of the rivers reached very good argument, with only a 3% difference when compared to JUPEM. Additionally, the shape of watershed from GE was slightly smaller than JUPEM, with a difference of about 17%. This study concludes that the DEM from GE can be used as an alternative source of DEM data, especially for studies related to hydrology. © 2018 Author(s). |
publisher |
American Institute of Physics Inc. |
issn |
0094243X |
language |
English |
format |
Conference paper |
accesstype |
|
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1825722584962957312 |