Lift, drag and pitching moment performances of different wing profiles for MAV wings

The wing profile for Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) can be easily developed through the polynomial equation method which is proven in generating good aerodynamic performances. However, the study demands more studies in profile configurations to provide more evidence which interrelated with its aerodynamic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Main Author: Ismail N.I.; Yusoff H.; Sharudin H.; Suhaimi S.; Hamdan S.K.
Format: Conference paper
Language:English
Published: Institute of Physics Publishing 2019
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85077799250&doi=10.1088%2f1742-6596%2f1349%2f1%2f012024&partnerID=40&md5=0e367bcf1648dd74f8ded4c7553e9615
id 2-s2.0-85077799250
spelling 2-s2.0-85077799250
Ismail N.I.; Yusoff H.; Sharudin H.; Suhaimi S.; Hamdan S.K.
Lift, drag and pitching moment performances of different wing profiles for MAV wings
2019
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
1349
1
10.1088/1742-6596/1349/1/012024
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85077799250&doi=10.1088%2f1742-6596%2f1349%2f1%2f012024&partnerID=40&md5=0e367bcf1648dd74f8ded4c7553e9615
The wing profile for Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) can be easily developed through the polynomial equation method which is proven in generating good aerodynamic performances. However, the study demands more studies in profile configurations to provide more evidence which interrelated with its aerodynamic performances. Thus, in this works, an aerodynamic study on different wing profiles configurations has been carried out. Profile 1, Profile 2 and Profile 3 were developed through the 3rd order polynomial equations have analyzed based on simulation works by using ANSYS-CFX. Based on the lift distribution analysis, it shows that Profile 3 has a huge advantage in generating better lift distribution (CL) among the wing profiles. Profile 3 able to produce at least 20% to 22.9% better maximum lift coefficient (CLmax) and CL magnitude compared to the other wing profiles. Despite its benevolent in CL performances, Profile 3 has induced the highest drag (CD) penalty among the wing profiles. Profile 3 has consistently produced at least 57.5% higher CD magnitude compared to other wing profiles. However, in terms of moment coefficient (CM) performances, Profile 3 has shown a promising ability in providing better wing stability compared to the other wing profile due to steeper CM slope. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.
Institute of Physics Publishing
17426588
English
Conference paper
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Ismail N.I.; Yusoff H.; Sharudin H.; Suhaimi S.; Hamdan S.K.
spellingShingle Ismail N.I.; Yusoff H.; Sharudin H.; Suhaimi S.; Hamdan S.K.
Lift, drag and pitching moment performances of different wing profiles for MAV wings
author_facet Ismail N.I.; Yusoff H.; Sharudin H.; Suhaimi S.; Hamdan S.K.
author_sort Ismail N.I.; Yusoff H.; Sharudin H.; Suhaimi S.; Hamdan S.K.
title Lift, drag and pitching moment performances of different wing profiles for MAV wings
title_short Lift, drag and pitching moment performances of different wing profiles for MAV wings
title_full Lift, drag and pitching moment performances of different wing profiles for MAV wings
title_fullStr Lift, drag and pitching moment performances of different wing profiles for MAV wings
title_full_unstemmed Lift, drag and pitching moment performances of different wing profiles for MAV wings
title_sort Lift, drag and pitching moment performances of different wing profiles for MAV wings
publishDate 2019
container_title Journal of Physics: Conference Series
container_volume 1349
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1742-6596/1349/1/012024
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85077799250&doi=10.1088%2f1742-6596%2f1349%2f1%2f012024&partnerID=40&md5=0e367bcf1648dd74f8ded4c7553e9615
description The wing profile for Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) can be easily developed through the polynomial equation method which is proven in generating good aerodynamic performances. However, the study demands more studies in profile configurations to provide more evidence which interrelated with its aerodynamic performances. Thus, in this works, an aerodynamic study on different wing profiles configurations has been carried out. Profile 1, Profile 2 and Profile 3 were developed through the 3rd order polynomial equations have analyzed based on simulation works by using ANSYS-CFX. Based on the lift distribution analysis, it shows that Profile 3 has a huge advantage in generating better lift distribution (CL) among the wing profiles. Profile 3 able to produce at least 20% to 22.9% better maximum lift coefficient (CLmax) and CL magnitude compared to the other wing profiles. Despite its benevolent in CL performances, Profile 3 has induced the highest drag (CD) penalty among the wing profiles. Profile 3 has consistently produced at least 57.5% higher CD magnitude compared to other wing profiles. However, in terms of moment coefficient (CM) performances, Profile 3 has shown a promising ability in providing better wing stability compared to the other wing profile due to steeper CM slope. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.
publisher Institute of Physics Publishing
issn 17426588
language English
format Conference paper
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677900759171072