Evaluating the content validity of digital literacy instrument for school teachers in Malaysia through expert judgement

In the development of digital technology, schools must equip students with digital literacy skills to develop thinking both critically and creatively and make teaching and learning relevant to the students. There are various measuring instruments that have been developed to assess digital literacy f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Main Author: Baharuddin M.F.; Masrek M.N.; Shuhidan S.M.; Razali M.H.B.H.; Rahman M.S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IJETAE Publication House 2021
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85110967703&doi=10.46338%2fijetae0721_09&partnerID=40&md5=683f6076604bc77d3a0e8d6a5e3a4169
id 2-s2.0-85110967703
spelling 2-s2.0-85110967703
Baharuddin M.F.; Masrek M.N.; Shuhidan S.M.; Razali M.H.B.H.; Rahman M.S.
Evaluating the content validity of digital literacy instrument for school teachers in Malaysia through expert judgement
2021
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
11
7
10.46338/ijetae0721_09
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85110967703&doi=10.46338%2fijetae0721_09&partnerID=40&md5=683f6076604bc77d3a0e8d6a5e3a4169
In the development of digital technology, schools must equip students with digital literacy skills to develop thinking both critically and creatively and make teaching and learning relevant to the students. There are various measuring instruments that have been developed to assess digital literacy for various target groups. However, quality and valid instruments are still limited and lacking. It is important to apply a valid measuring instrument for digital literacy based on its results in the case of overlapping and ambiguous constructions in the name of digital literacy. Thus, to assess the content validity of the questionnaire that had been generated to evaluate digital literacy of the school teachers is the main focus. The validity of the content was used as a criterion to confirm that the questionnaire was of high quality. The instrument's content validity was assessed according to the feedbacks of six professional in the field. The item content validity index and scale content validity index were implemented for content validity. Three (3) constructs namely; technical, cognitive, and social-emotional contain 6 items each were identified. The results of content validity index (I-CVI) showed between 0.97 to 1 and the scale content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) for the technical, cognitive, and social-emotional dimension of digital literacy was 1.00, 0.97, and 0.97 respectively. The questionnaire was identified with acceptable content validity. Further research able to guarantee that the questionnaire is checked for reliability as well as the other types of validity, including as face validity, construct validity, and criterion validity, in order to improve the assessment instrument's usefulness. © 2021. The Author(s).
IJETAE Publication House
22502459
English
Article
All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
author Baharuddin M.F.; Masrek M.N.; Shuhidan S.M.; Razali M.H.B.H.; Rahman M.S.
spellingShingle Baharuddin M.F.; Masrek M.N.; Shuhidan S.M.; Razali M.H.B.H.; Rahman M.S.
Evaluating the content validity of digital literacy instrument for school teachers in Malaysia through expert judgement
author_facet Baharuddin M.F.; Masrek M.N.; Shuhidan S.M.; Razali M.H.B.H.; Rahman M.S.
author_sort Baharuddin M.F.; Masrek M.N.; Shuhidan S.M.; Razali M.H.B.H.; Rahman M.S.
title Evaluating the content validity of digital literacy instrument for school teachers in Malaysia through expert judgement
title_short Evaluating the content validity of digital literacy instrument for school teachers in Malaysia through expert judgement
title_full Evaluating the content validity of digital literacy instrument for school teachers in Malaysia through expert judgement
title_fullStr Evaluating the content validity of digital literacy instrument for school teachers in Malaysia through expert judgement
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the content validity of digital literacy instrument for school teachers in Malaysia through expert judgement
title_sort Evaluating the content validity of digital literacy instrument for school teachers in Malaysia through expert judgement
publishDate 2021
container_title International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
container_volume 11
container_issue 7
doi_str_mv 10.46338/ijetae0721_09
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85110967703&doi=10.46338%2fijetae0721_09&partnerID=40&md5=683f6076604bc77d3a0e8d6a5e3a4169
description In the development of digital technology, schools must equip students with digital literacy skills to develop thinking both critically and creatively and make teaching and learning relevant to the students. There are various measuring instruments that have been developed to assess digital literacy for various target groups. However, quality and valid instruments are still limited and lacking. It is important to apply a valid measuring instrument for digital literacy based on its results in the case of overlapping and ambiguous constructions in the name of digital literacy. Thus, to assess the content validity of the questionnaire that had been generated to evaluate digital literacy of the school teachers is the main focus. The validity of the content was used as a criterion to confirm that the questionnaire was of high quality. The instrument's content validity was assessed according to the feedbacks of six professional in the field. The item content validity index and scale content validity index were implemented for content validity. Three (3) constructs namely; technical, cognitive, and social-emotional contain 6 items each were identified. The results of content validity index (I-CVI) showed between 0.97 to 1 and the scale content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) for the technical, cognitive, and social-emotional dimension of digital literacy was 1.00, 0.97, and 0.97 respectively. The questionnaire was identified with acceptable content validity. Further research able to guarantee that the questionnaire is checked for reliability as well as the other types of validity, including as face validity, construct validity, and criterion validity, in order to improve the assessment instrument's usefulness. © 2021. The Author(s).
publisher IJETAE Publication House
issn 22502459
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1812871798987948032