Retrospective assessment of the reporting of adverse drug reactions in a Malaysian clinical training center: A short communication

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the completeness and quality of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports that were submitted to the Pharmacovigilance Unit (PVU) in clinical training center (CTC), Faculty of Medicine, UiTM Sungai Buloh Campus. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conduc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Main Author: Elkalmi R.; Elnaem M.; Sapar N.; Blebil A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85121122456&doi=10.4103%2fjpbs.JPBS_577_20&partnerID=40&md5=d06c712a607205cca89e942e722df817
id 2-s2.0-85121122456
spelling 2-s2.0-85121122456
Elkalmi R.; Elnaem M.; Sapar N.; Blebil A.
Retrospective assessment of the reporting of adverse drug reactions in a Malaysian clinical training center: A short communication
2021
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
13
3
10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_577_20
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85121122456&doi=10.4103%2fjpbs.JPBS_577_20&partnerID=40&md5=d06c712a607205cca89e942e722df817
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the completeness and quality of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports that were submitted to the Pharmacovigilance Unit (PVU) in clinical training center (CTC), Faculty of Medicine, UiTM Sungai Buloh Campus. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using all ADR reports that were submitted to the PVU in CTC from December 31, 2000, to December 31, 2018. The completeness was assessed by reviewing all the required elements to be filled in the ADR reports. The quality was assessed by investigating the required information in the ADR reporting form. Descriptive statistics have been used to present the findings. Key Findings: In a total of 31 reports that were submitted to the PVU in CTC, 98.9% of patient's information and 100% of ADR descriptions were completed. Suspected drug information and the reporter's details were completed by 52.2% and 79.6%, respectively. Of 58.0% of the information about seriousness recorded, 38.9% (n = 7) is mild, 44.4% (n = 8) is moderate, and 16.7% (n = 3) is severe. Among all the suspected medicines, drug class of antibiotics (32.4%, n = 12) is the most reported suspected drugs that caused ADR, followed by opioid analgesic (8.1%, n = 3) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8.1%, n = 3). Conclusion: Further efforts and relevant interventions should be considered to increase the reporting frequency and to enhance the completeness and the quality of the ADR reports in the study setting. © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
9757406
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Elkalmi R.; Elnaem M.; Sapar N.; Blebil A.
spellingShingle Elkalmi R.; Elnaem M.; Sapar N.; Blebil A.
Retrospective assessment of the reporting of adverse drug reactions in a Malaysian clinical training center: A short communication
author_facet Elkalmi R.; Elnaem M.; Sapar N.; Blebil A.
author_sort Elkalmi R.; Elnaem M.; Sapar N.; Blebil A.
title Retrospective assessment of the reporting of adverse drug reactions in a Malaysian clinical training center: A short communication
title_short Retrospective assessment of the reporting of adverse drug reactions in a Malaysian clinical training center: A short communication
title_full Retrospective assessment of the reporting of adverse drug reactions in a Malaysian clinical training center: A short communication
title_fullStr Retrospective assessment of the reporting of adverse drug reactions in a Malaysian clinical training center: A short communication
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective assessment of the reporting of adverse drug reactions in a Malaysian clinical training center: A short communication
title_sort Retrospective assessment of the reporting of adverse drug reactions in a Malaysian clinical training center: A short communication
publishDate 2021
container_title Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
container_volume 13
container_issue 3
doi_str_mv 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_577_20
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85121122456&doi=10.4103%2fjpbs.JPBS_577_20&partnerID=40&md5=d06c712a607205cca89e942e722df817
description Objectives: This study aimed to assess the completeness and quality of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports that were submitted to the Pharmacovigilance Unit (PVU) in clinical training center (CTC), Faculty of Medicine, UiTM Sungai Buloh Campus. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using all ADR reports that were submitted to the PVU in CTC from December 31, 2000, to December 31, 2018. The completeness was assessed by reviewing all the required elements to be filled in the ADR reports. The quality was assessed by investigating the required information in the ADR reporting form. Descriptive statistics have been used to present the findings. Key Findings: In a total of 31 reports that were submitted to the PVU in CTC, 98.9% of patient's information and 100% of ADR descriptions were completed. Suspected drug information and the reporter's details were completed by 52.2% and 79.6%, respectively. Of 58.0% of the information about seriousness recorded, 38.9% (n = 7) is mild, 44.4% (n = 8) is moderate, and 16.7% (n = 3) is severe. Among all the suspected medicines, drug class of antibiotics (32.4%, n = 12) is the most reported suspected drugs that caused ADR, followed by opioid analgesic (8.1%, n = 3) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8.1%, n = 3). Conclusion: Further efforts and relevant interventions should be considered to increase the reporting frequency and to enhance the completeness and the quality of the ADR reports in the study setting. © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
issn 9757406
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1812871798855827456