A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
Background: This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate health sciences students using systematic review. Online learning has been chosen as the best approach to continue offering education in this pandemic era. Method: The scree...
Published in: | BMC Medical Education |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central Ltd
2022
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133285706&doi=10.1186%2fs12909-022-03579-1&partnerID=40&md5=d5e2336a2c4b26893ba953f5457e7f64 |
id |
2-s2.0-85133285706 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85133285706 Abdull Mutalib A.A.; Md. Akim A.; Jaafar M.H. A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic 2022 BMC Medical Education 22 1 10.1186/s12909-022-03579-1 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133285706&doi=10.1186%2fs12909-022-03579-1&partnerID=40&md5=d5e2336a2c4b26893ba953f5457e7f64 Background: This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate health sciences students using systematic review. Online learning has been chosen as the best approach to continue offering education in this pandemic era. Method: The screening process was done using Scopus, ScienceDirect and PubMed based on the eligibility criteria. Out of 1486 studies, 1269 were screened. A total of 64 eligible studies obtained were included in the quantitative analysis. Results were categorized into i) student attitudes (perceptions/satisfactions/engagements), and ii) student learning outcomes, and compared to the Kirkpatrick model. Results: Although facing difficulties, 50% of the studies was moderately satisfied with distance learning, while 36% was highly satisfied and 17% dissatisfied. Most studies (26%) reported flexibility in online learning. Internet issues (19%) and low interaction between learners and instructors (19%) were the most prevalent problems mentioned. Online education engages students better than traditional learning. The learning outcome was assessed using two categories: i) academic performance and ii) skill development. Most studies (72%) stated that online learning improves academic performance, 14% reported a drop, and 14% stated no effect, while an increase in clinical skills and communication skills were reported. Kirkpatrick evaluation revealed 80% of the studies obtained was evaluated at level 1 (reaction), 8% at level 2 (learning), 12% at level 3 (behaviour) and none at level 4 (results). Conclusion: Overall, this systematic review found that the online learning performed better than expected during COVID-19, but the data gained is insufficient to say it is beneficial when compared to other types of teaching approaches. © 2022, The Author(s). BioMed Central Ltd 14726920 English Article All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access |
author |
Abdull Mutalib A.A.; Md. Akim A.; Jaafar M.H. |
spellingShingle |
Abdull Mutalib A.A.; Md. Akim A.; Jaafar M.H. A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic |
author_facet |
Abdull Mutalib A.A.; Md. Akim A.; Jaafar M.H. |
author_sort |
Abdull Mutalib A.A.; Md. Akim A.; Jaafar M.H. |
title |
A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short |
A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full |
A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr |
A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed |
A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort |
A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic |
publishDate |
2022 |
container_title |
BMC Medical Education |
container_volume |
22 |
container_issue |
1 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1186/s12909-022-03579-1 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133285706&doi=10.1186%2fs12909-022-03579-1&partnerID=40&md5=d5e2336a2c4b26893ba953f5457e7f64 |
description |
Background: This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate health sciences students using systematic review. Online learning has been chosen as the best approach to continue offering education in this pandemic era. Method: The screening process was done using Scopus, ScienceDirect and PubMed based on the eligibility criteria. Out of 1486 studies, 1269 were screened. A total of 64 eligible studies obtained were included in the quantitative analysis. Results were categorized into i) student attitudes (perceptions/satisfactions/engagements), and ii) student learning outcomes, and compared to the Kirkpatrick model. Results: Although facing difficulties, 50% of the studies was moderately satisfied with distance learning, while 36% was highly satisfied and 17% dissatisfied. Most studies (26%) reported flexibility in online learning. Internet issues (19%) and low interaction between learners and instructors (19%) were the most prevalent problems mentioned. Online education engages students better than traditional learning. The learning outcome was assessed using two categories: i) academic performance and ii) skill development. Most studies (72%) stated that online learning improves academic performance, 14% reported a drop, and 14% stated no effect, while an increase in clinical skills and communication skills were reported. Kirkpatrick evaluation revealed 80% of the studies obtained was evaluated at level 1 (reaction), 8% at level 2 (learning), 12% at level 3 (behaviour) and none at level 4 (results). Conclusion: Overall, this systematic review found that the online learning performed better than expected during COVID-19, but the data gained is insufficient to say it is beneficial when compared to other types of teaching approaches. © 2022, The Author(s). |
publisher |
BioMed Central Ltd |
issn |
14726920 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access |
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1825722581849735168 |