A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background: This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate health sciences students using systematic review. Online learning has been chosen as the best approach to continue offering education in this pandemic era. Method: The scree...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC Medical Education
Main Author: Abdull Mutalib A.A.; Md. Akim A.; Jaafar M.H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd 2022
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133285706&doi=10.1186%2fs12909-022-03579-1&partnerID=40&md5=d5e2336a2c4b26893ba953f5457e7f64
id 2-s2.0-85133285706
spelling 2-s2.0-85133285706
Abdull Mutalib A.A.; Md. Akim A.; Jaafar M.H.
A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
2022
BMC Medical Education
22
1
10.1186/s12909-022-03579-1
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133285706&doi=10.1186%2fs12909-022-03579-1&partnerID=40&md5=d5e2336a2c4b26893ba953f5457e7f64
Background: This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate health sciences students using systematic review. Online learning has been chosen as the best approach to continue offering education in this pandemic era. Method: The screening process was done using Scopus, ScienceDirect and PubMed based on the eligibility criteria. Out of 1486 studies, 1269 were screened. A total of 64 eligible studies obtained were included in the quantitative analysis. Results were categorized into i) student attitudes (perceptions/satisfactions/engagements), and ii) student learning outcomes, and compared to the Kirkpatrick model. Results: Although facing difficulties, 50% of the studies was moderately satisfied with distance learning, while 36% was highly satisfied and 17% dissatisfied. Most studies (26%) reported flexibility in online learning. Internet issues (19%) and low interaction between learners and instructors (19%) were the most prevalent problems mentioned. Online education engages students better than traditional learning. The learning outcome was assessed using two categories: i) academic performance and ii) skill development. Most studies (72%) stated that online learning improves academic performance, 14% reported a drop, and 14% stated no effect, while an increase in clinical skills and communication skills were reported. Kirkpatrick evaluation revealed 80% of the studies obtained was evaluated at level 1 (reaction), 8% at level 2 (learning), 12% at level 3 (behaviour) and none at level 4 (results). Conclusion: Overall, this systematic review found that the online learning performed better than expected during COVID-19, but the data gained is insufficient to say it is beneficial when compared to other types of teaching approaches. © 2022, The Author(s).
BioMed Central Ltd
14726920
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access
author Abdull Mutalib A.A.; Md. Akim A.; Jaafar M.H.
spellingShingle Abdull Mutalib A.A.; Md. Akim A.; Jaafar M.H.
A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
author_facet Abdull Mutalib A.A.; Md. Akim A.; Jaafar M.H.
author_sort Abdull Mutalib A.A.; Md. Akim A.; Jaafar M.H.
title A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
publishDate 2022
container_title BMC Medical Education
container_volume 22
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12909-022-03579-1
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133285706&doi=10.1186%2fs12909-022-03579-1&partnerID=40&md5=d5e2336a2c4b26893ba953f5457e7f64
description Background: This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate health sciences students using systematic review. Online learning has been chosen as the best approach to continue offering education in this pandemic era. Method: The screening process was done using Scopus, ScienceDirect and PubMed based on the eligibility criteria. Out of 1486 studies, 1269 were screened. A total of 64 eligible studies obtained were included in the quantitative analysis. Results were categorized into i) student attitudes (perceptions/satisfactions/engagements), and ii) student learning outcomes, and compared to the Kirkpatrick model. Results: Although facing difficulties, 50% of the studies was moderately satisfied with distance learning, while 36% was highly satisfied and 17% dissatisfied. Most studies (26%) reported flexibility in online learning. Internet issues (19%) and low interaction between learners and instructors (19%) were the most prevalent problems mentioned. Online education engages students better than traditional learning. The learning outcome was assessed using two categories: i) academic performance and ii) skill development. Most studies (72%) stated that online learning improves academic performance, 14% reported a drop, and 14% stated no effect, while an increase in clinical skills and communication skills were reported. Kirkpatrick evaluation revealed 80% of the studies obtained was evaluated at level 1 (reaction), 8% at level 2 (learning), 12% at level 3 (behaviour) and none at level 4 (results). Conclusion: Overall, this systematic review found that the online learning performed better than expected during COVID-19, but the data gained is insufficient to say it is beneficial when compared to other types of teaching approaches. © 2022, The Author(s).
publisher BioMed Central Ltd
issn 14726920
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1825722581849735168