The role of ombudsman: Resolving financial disputes in Malaysia

The paper highlights the establishment of the Ombudsman for Financial Services (OFS) in Malaysia as a good alternative avenue for the equitable settlement of disputes regarding financial services. It has been operating since 2016. However, its accessibility to reach wider financial consumers is rest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Main Author: Mohd Zain M.I.; Rahmat N.E.; Ilias I.I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: John Wiley and Sons Inc 2022
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85141449375&doi=10.1002%2fcrq.21366&partnerID=40&md5=ccfc09050fcafb97b3395aa566b963ab
id 2-s2.0-85141449375
spelling 2-s2.0-85141449375
Mohd Zain M.I.; Rahmat N.E.; Ilias I.I.
The role of ombudsman: Resolving financial disputes in Malaysia
2022
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
40
2
10.1002/crq.21366
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85141449375&doi=10.1002%2fcrq.21366&partnerID=40&md5=ccfc09050fcafb97b3395aa566b963ab
The paper highlights the establishment of the Ombudsman for Financial Services (OFS) in Malaysia as a good alternative avenue for the equitable settlement of disputes regarding financial services. It has been operating since 2016. However, its accessibility to reach wider financial consumers is restricted due to its limited monetary jurisdiction which is incompatible with the current market conditions. Adopting a qualitative content analysis approach, this study reviews the primary legal framework for implementing the financial ombudsman scheme in Malaysia under Financial Service Act 2013 (FSA), Islamic Financial Service Act 2013 (IFSA), Financial Services (Financial Ombudsman Scheme) Regulations 2015 and Islamic Financial Services (Financial Ombudsman Scheme) Regulations 2015 with special focus on monetary jurisdiction. The study has also analyses the jurisdiction of other countries, and the results found that the monetary jurisdiction of the law in Malaysia is still small and limited. Based on comparative analysis, this study suggests an agile approach in determining the monetary jurisdiction through a flexible provision allowing a review every 3 years based on the consumer price index and relevant reports. This way, its accessibility to wider financial disputes will be elevated. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
John Wiley and Sons Inc
15365581
English
Article

author Mohd Zain M.I.; Rahmat N.E.; Ilias I.I.
spellingShingle Mohd Zain M.I.; Rahmat N.E.; Ilias I.I.
The role of ombudsman: Resolving financial disputes in Malaysia
author_facet Mohd Zain M.I.; Rahmat N.E.; Ilias I.I.
author_sort Mohd Zain M.I.; Rahmat N.E.; Ilias I.I.
title The role of ombudsman: Resolving financial disputes in Malaysia
title_short The role of ombudsman: Resolving financial disputes in Malaysia
title_full The role of ombudsman: Resolving financial disputes in Malaysia
title_fullStr The role of ombudsman: Resolving financial disputes in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed The role of ombudsman: Resolving financial disputes in Malaysia
title_sort The role of ombudsman: Resolving financial disputes in Malaysia
publishDate 2022
container_title Conflict Resolution Quarterly
container_volume 40
container_issue 2
doi_str_mv 10.1002/crq.21366
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85141449375&doi=10.1002%2fcrq.21366&partnerID=40&md5=ccfc09050fcafb97b3395aa566b963ab
description The paper highlights the establishment of the Ombudsman for Financial Services (OFS) in Malaysia as a good alternative avenue for the equitable settlement of disputes regarding financial services. It has been operating since 2016. However, its accessibility to reach wider financial consumers is restricted due to its limited monetary jurisdiction which is incompatible with the current market conditions. Adopting a qualitative content analysis approach, this study reviews the primary legal framework for implementing the financial ombudsman scheme in Malaysia under Financial Service Act 2013 (FSA), Islamic Financial Service Act 2013 (IFSA), Financial Services (Financial Ombudsman Scheme) Regulations 2015 and Islamic Financial Services (Financial Ombudsman Scheme) Regulations 2015 with special focus on monetary jurisdiction. The study has also analyses the jurisdiction of other countries, and the results found that the monetary jurisdiction of the law in Malaysia is still small and limited. Based on comparative analysis, this study suggests an agile approach in determining the monetary jurisdiction through a flexible provision allowing a review every 3 years based on the consumer price index and relevant reports. This way, its accessibility to wider financial disputes will be elevated. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc
issn 15365581
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678157463158784