Comparison between FMAR SD method and NRMI CG method and application

The FMAR steepest descent method and NRMI conjugate gradient method are the modification methods in the steepest descent method and conjugate gradient method respectively. Both methods are to minimize nonlinear unconstrained optimization problems. In this paper, a comparison has been made between th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:AIP Conference Proceedings
Main Author: Shapiee N.; Hajar N.; Husin S.F.; Ghani N.H.A.; Zullpakkal N.
Format: Conference paper
Language:English
Published: American Institute of Physics 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188428076&doi=10.1063%2f5.0193408&partnerID=40&md5=8a6143dc50d22455bef82bde83a27480
id 2-s2.0-85188428076
spelling 2-s2.0-85188428076
Shapiee N.; Hajar N.; Husin S.F.; Ghani N.H.A.; Zullpakkal N.
Comparison between FMAR SD method and NRMI CG method and application
2024
AIP Conference Proceedings
2895
1
10.1063/5.0193408
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188428076&doi=10.1063%2f5.0193408&partnerID=40&md5=8a6143dc50d22455bef82bde83a27480
The FMAR steepest descent method and NRMI conjugate gradient method are the modification methods in the steepest descent method and conjugate gradient method respectively. Both methods are to minimize nonlinear unconstrained optimization problems. In this paper, a comparison has been made between the NRMI conjugate gradient method and the FMAR steepest descent method by using an exact line search and apply in real-life problems since there exist modifications in the conjugate gradient method and steepest descent method. Algorithms are presented and implemented in MATLAB software for both methods. Numerical results are presented based on the number of iterations and central processing unit time which have shown that the NRMI CG method performs better than the FMAR SD method for given standard test problems and is recommended to be applied in other real-life problems. © 2024 Author(s).
American Institute of Physics
0094243X
English
Conference paper
All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
author Shapiee N.; Hajar N.; Husin S.F.; Ghani N.H.A.; Zullpakkal N.
spellingShingle Shapiee N.; Hajar N.; Husin S.F.; Ghani N.H.A.; Zullpakkal N.
Comparison between FMAR SD method and NRMI CG method and application
author_facet Shapiee N.; Hajar N.; Husin S.F.; Ghani N.H.A.; Zullpakkal N.
author_sort Shapiee N.; Hajar N.; Husin S.F.; Ghani N.H.A.; Zullpakkal N.
title Comparison between FMAR SD method and NRMI CG method and application
title_short Comparison between FMAR SD method and NRMI CG method and application
title_full Comparison between FMAR SD method and NRMI CG method and application
title_fullStr Comparison between FMAR SD method and NRMI CG method and application
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between FMAR SD method and NRMI CG method and application
title_sort Comparison between FMAR SD method and NRMI CG method and application
publishDate 2024
container_title AIP Conference Proceedings
container_volume 2895
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0193408
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188428076&doi=10.1063%2f5.0193408&partnerID=40&md5=8a6143dc50d22455bef82bde83a27480
description The FMAR steepest descent method and NRMI conjugate gradient method are the modification methods in the steepest descent method and conjugate gradient method respectively. Both methods are to minimize nonlinear unconstrained optimization problems. In this paper, a comparison has been made between the NRMI conjugate gradient method and the FMAR steepest descent method by using an exact line search and apply in real-life problems since there exist modifications in the conjugate gradient method and steepest descent method. Algorithms are presented and implemented in MATLAB software for both methods. Numerical results are presented based on the number of iterations and central processing unit time which have shown that the NRMI CG method performs better than the FMAR SD method for given standard test problems and is recommended to be applied in other real-life problems. © 2024 Author(s).
publisher American Institute of Physics
issn 0094243X
language English
format Conference paper
accesstype All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677674427187200