Investigating the Inter-Rater Reliability and Usability of Telehealth for Home Hazard Falls-Risk Assessment After Stroke

Introduction: Stroke survivors are more likely to fall at home. A home hazard assessment may be beneficial to reduce the risk of falling; however, it is resourceful and time-intensive. This study examines the inter-rater reliability and usability of telehealth for a hazard assessment to address the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Modern Rehabilitation
Main Author: Ainuddin H.A.; Romli M.H.; Hamid T.A.; Salim M.S.F.; Mackenzie L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2024
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85204792940&doi=10.18502%2fjmr.v18i3.16418&partnerID=40&md5=871039f1667089d358bf2de9c6e02257
id 2-s2.0-85204792940
spelling 2-s2.0-85204792940
Ainuddin H.A.; Romli M.H.; Hamid T.A.; Salim M.S.F.; Mackenzie L.
Investigating the Inter-Rater Reliability and Usability of Telehealth for Home Hazard Falls-Risk Assessment After Stroke
2024
Journal of Modern Rehabilitation
18
3
10.18502/jmr.v18i3.16418
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85204792940&doi=10.18502%2fjmr.v18i3.16418&partnerID=40&md5=871039f1667089d358bf2de9c6e02257
Introduction: Stroke survivors are more likely to fall at home. A home hazard assessment may be beneficial to reduce the risk of falling; however, it is resourceful and time-intensive. This study examines the inter-rater reliability and usability of telehealth for a hazard assessment to address the risk of falls. Materials and Methods: Two occupational therapists accessed the telehealth platform from different locations and simultaneously rated participants’ home environment using the home falls and accident screening Tool. Stroke survivors and their caregivers answered the telehealth usability questionnaire. Results: A total of 36 stroke survivors and 31 caregivers participated in the study. Gwet’s AC1 was used for agreement analysis. The overall AC1 value for the inter-rater reliability was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66%, 1.00%). There was a moderate correlation between the raters (r=0.57, P=0.000). Bland and Altman graph plot showed a mean difference of -0.61 and 97.2% of the difference score fell within the limits of agreement (95% CI, -5.67%, 4.39%). The overall mean score of the telehealth usability questionnaire was 5.62 out of 7. Conclusion: Telehealth technology is a potential medium that provides an opportunity for synchronous practitioner-client interaction in evaluating home hazards. Some challenges were noted during the telehealth sessions, thus requiring a brief protocol to navigate the system. © 2024 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2538385X
English
Article

author Ainuddin H.A.; Romli M.H.; Hamid T.A.; Salim M.S.F.; Mackenzie L.
spellingShingle Ainuddin H.A.; Romli M.H.; Hamid T.A.; Salim M.S.F.; Mackenzie L.
Investigating the Inter-Rater Reliability and Usability of Telehealth for Home Hazard Falls-Risk Assessment After Stroke
author_facet Ainuddin H.A.; Romli M.H.; Hamid T.A.; Salim M.S.F.; Mackenzie L.
author_sort Ainuddin H.A.; Romli M.H.; Hamid T.A.; Salim M.S.F.; Mackenzie L.
title Investigating the Inter-Rater Reliability and Usability of Telehealth for Home Hazard Falls-Risk Assessment After Stroke
title_short Investigating the Inter-Rater Reliability and Usability of Telehealth for Home Hazard Falls-Risk Assessment After Stroke
title_full Investigating the Inter-Rater Reliability and Usability of Telehealth for Home Hazard Falls-Risk Assessment After Stroke
title_fullStr Investigating the Inter-Rater Reliability and Usability of Telehealth for Home Hazard Falls-Risk Assessment After Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the Inter-Rater Reliability and Usability of Telehealth for Home Hazard Falls-Risk Assessment After Stroke
title_sort Investigating the Inter-Rater Reliability and Usability of Telehealth for Home Hazard Falls-Risk Assessment After Stroke
publishDate 2024
container_title Journal of Modern Rehabilitation
container_volume 18
container_issue 3
doi_str_mv 10.18502/jmr.v18i3.16418
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85204792940&doi=10.18502%2fjmr.v18i3.16418&partnerID=40&md5=871039f1667089d358bf2de9c6e02257
description Introduction: Stroke survivors are more likely to fall at home. A home hazard assessment may be beneficial to reduce the risk of falling; however, it is resourceful and time-intensive. This study examines the inter-rater reliability and usability of telehealth for a hazard assessment to address the risk of falls. Materials and Methods: Two occupational therapists accessed the telehealth platform from different locations and simultaneously rated participants’ home environment using the home falls and accident screening Tool. Stroke survivors and their caregivers answered the telehealth usability questionnaire. Results: A total of 36 stroke survivors and 31 caregivers participated in the study. Gwet’s AC1 was used for agreement analysis. The overall AC1 value for the inter-rater reliability was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66%, 1.00%). There was a moderate correlation between the raters (r=0.57, P=0.000). Bland and Altman graph plot showed a mean difference of -0.61 and 97.2% of the difference score fell within the limits of agreement (95% CI, -5.67%, 4.39%). The overall mean score of the telehealth usability questionnaire was 5.62 out of 7. Conclusion: Telehealth technology is a potential medium that provides an opportunity for synchronous practitioner-client interaction in evaluating home hazards. Some challenges were noted during the telehealth sessions, thus requiring a brief protocol to navigate the system. © 2024 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved.
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
issn 2538385X
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1814778498992046080