Comparative analysis of deep neural network architectures for renewable energy forecasting: enhancing accuracy with meteorological and time-based features
This study evaluates and differentiates five advanced machine learning models—LSTM, GRU, CNN-LSTM, Random Forest, and SVR—aimed at precisely estimating solar and wind power generation to enhance renewable energy forecasting. LSTM achieved a remarkable Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.010 and R2 score o...
Published in: | Discover Sustainability |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2024
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85213685937&doi=10.1007%2fs43621-024-00783-5&partnerID=40&md5=f45c8c868b50c1efa158f9dcdfef51ae |
id |
2-s2.0-85213685937 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85213685937 Khan S.; Mazhar T.; Khan M.A.; Shahzad T.; Ahmad W.; Bibi A.; Saeed M.M.; Hamam H. Comparative analysis of deep neural network architectures for renewable energy forecasting: enhancing accuracy with meteorological and time-based features 2024 Discover Sustainability 5 1 10.1007/s43621-024-00783-5 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85213685937&doi=10.1007%2fs43621-024-00783-5&partnerID=40&md5=f45c8c868b50c1efa158f9dcdfef51ae This study evaluates and differentiates five advanced machine learning models—LSTM, GRU, CNN-LSTM, Random Forest, and SVR—aimed at precisely estimating solar and wind power generation to enhance renewable energy forecasting. LSTM achieved a remarkable Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.010 and R2 score of 0.90, highlighting its proficiency in capturing intricate temporal relationships. GRU closely followed, demonstrating potential as a viable option due to its remarkable combination of computational efficiency and accuracy (MSE = 0.015, R2 = 0.88). In datasets abundant in spatial correlations, the CNN-LSTM hybrid demonstrated its utility by providing novel insights into spatial–temporal patterns; nonetheless, it lagged considerably in accuracy, with a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.020 and a R2 of 0.87. Conversely, traditional models demonstrated a reliable albeit less dynamic ability to elucidate the complexities of renewable energy data; for instance, Random Forest exhibited a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.025, while Support Vector Regression (SVR) recorded an MSE of 0.030. The results affirm that deep learning architectures, particularly LSTM, offer a transformative method for renewable energy forecasting, hence enhancing accuracy and reliability in energy management systems. © The Author(s) 2024. Springer Nature 26629984 English Article |
author |
Khan S.; Mazhar T.; Khan M.A.; Shahzad T.; Ahmad W.; Bibi A.; Saeed M.M.; Hamam H. |
spellingShingle |
Khan S.; Mazhar T.; Khan M.A.; Shahzad T.; Ahmad W.; Bibi A.; Saeed M.M.; Hamam H. Comparative analysis of deep neural network architectures for renewable energy forecasting: enhancing accuracy with meteorological and time-based features |
author_facet |
Khan S.; Mazhar T.; Khan M.A.; Shahzad T.; Ahmad W.; Bibi A.; Saeed M.M.; Hamam H. |
author_sort |
Khan S.; Mazhar T.; Khan M.A.; Shahzad T.; Ahmad W.; Bibi A.; Saeed M.M.; Hamam H. |
title |
Comparative analysis of deep neural network architectures for renewable energy forecasting: enhancing accuracy with meteorological and time-based features |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of deep neural network architectures for renewable energy forecasting: enhancing accuracy with meteorological and time-based features |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of deep neural network architectures for renewable energy forecasting: enhancing accuracy with meteorological and time-based features |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of deep neural network architectures for renewable energy forecasting: enhancing accuracy with meteorological and time-based features |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of deep neural network architectures for renewable energy forecasting: enhancing accuracy with meteorological and time-based features |
title_sort |
Comparative analysis of deep neural network architectures for renewable energy forecasting: enhancing accuracy with meteorological and time-based features |
publishDate |
2024 |
container_title |
Discover Sustainability |
container_volume |
5 |
container_issue |
1 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s43621-024-00783-5 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85213685937&doi=10.1007%2fs43621-024-00783-5&partnerID=40&md5=f45c8c868b50c1efa158f9dcdfef51ae |
description |
This study evaluates and differentiates five advanced machine learning models—LSTM, GRU, CNN-LSTM, Random Forest, and SVR—aimed at precisely estimating solar and wind power generation to enhance renewable energy forecasting. LSTM achieved a remarkable Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.010 and R2 score of 0.90, highlighting its proficiency in capturing intricate temporal relationships. GRU closely followed, demonstrating potential as a viable option due to its remarkable combination of computational efficiency and accuracy (MSE = 0.015, R2 = 0.88). In datasets abundant in spatial correlations, the CNN-LSTM hybrid demonstrated its utility by providing novel insights into spatial–temporal patterns; nonetheless, it lagged considerably in accuracy, with a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.020 and a R2 of 0.87. Conversely, traditional models demonstrated a reliable albeit less dynamic ability to elucidate the complexities of renewable energy data; for instance, Random Forest exhibited a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.025, while Support Vector Regression (SVR) recorded an MSE of 0.030. The results affirm that deep learning architectures, particularly LSTM, offer a transformative method for renewable energy forecasting, hence enhancing accuracy and reliability in energy management systems. © The Author(s) 2024. |
publisher |
Springer Nature |
issn |
26629984 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
|
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1823296152997462016 |