Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations

The aims of this study are to estimate the equivalent dose to the skin, eyes and thyroid in intra-and extra-oral imaging examination and to compare the dose-area product (DAP) derived from the calculation method with Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL) that has been provided by the Malaysian Ministry...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology
第一著者: 2-s2.0-85049149575
フォーマット: 論文
言語:English
出版事項: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2017
オンライン・アクセス:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049149575&partnerID=40&md5=ac2716fb8b3202f235e78d5b7c88f674
id Mohamed N.C.; Nawawi H.; Yusof M.Y.P.M.; Siong K.K.
spelling Mohamed N.C.; Nawawi H.; Yusof M.Y.P.M.; Siong K.K.
2-s2.0-85049149575
Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations
2017
Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology
25
S7

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049149575&partnerID=40&md5=ac2716fb8b3202f235e78d5b7c88f674
The aims of this study are to estimate the equivalent dose to the skin, eyes and thyroid in intra-and extra-oral imaging examination and to compare the dose-area product (DAP) derived from the calculation method with Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL) that has been provided by the Malaysian Ministry of Health (MOH). Dose equivalent is measured by placing Thermoluminescence Dosimeter (TLD-100H) in the anthropomorphic RANDO phantom. Exposure is performed using intra-oral X-ray machine ActeonSatelec X-Mind® and extra-oral X-ray machine InstrumentariumOP300®, and the value is compared to the equivalent dose of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) dose limit. DAP value for both examinations was obtained by using formula and comparing them with the DRL from MOH. The average dose equivalent of intra-and extra-oral radiographic examination is lower than the ICRP dose limit. The doses derived from both examinations did not exceed the prescribed levels when compared with DRL. The doses calculated for intra-oral examination of molar maxillary, molar mandibular and interproximal (bitewing) was 0.880 mGy while periapical examination of the anterior maxillary and mandibular was 0.688 mGy and occlusal examination was 1.100 mGy. For the panoramic examination the dose was 0.011 mGy.m2 while lateral cephalometric examination was 0.0054 mGy.m2. The doses obtained from this study were within the dose limit and predetermined level. This shows that a patient receives the minimum dose for both dental radiographic examinations with the optimum level of safety which meets the ALARA concept. © 2017 Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
1287680
English
Article

author 2-s2.0-85049149575
spellingShingle 2-s2.0-85049149575
Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations
author_facet 2-s2.0-85049149575
author_sort 2-s2.0-85049149575
title Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations
title_short Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations
title_full Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations
title_fullStr Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations
title_full_unstemmed Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations
title_sort Equivalent dose measurements from digital intra-and extra-oral imaging examinations
publishDate 2017
container_title Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology
container_volume 25
container_issue S7
doi_str_mv
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049149575&partnerID=40&md5=ac2716fb8b3202f235e78d5b7c88f674
description The aims of this study are to estimate the equivalent dose to the skin, eyes and thyroid in intra-and extra-oral imaging examination and to compare the dose-area product (DAP) derived from the calculation method with Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL) that has been provided by the Malaysian Ministry of Health (MOH). Dose equivalent is measured by placing Thermoluminescence Dosimeter (TLD-100H) in the anthropomorphic RANDO phantom. Exposure is performed using intra-oral X-ray machine ActeonSatelec X-Mind® and extra-oral X-ray machine InstrumentariumOP300®, and the value is compared to the equivalent dose of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) dose limit. DAP value for both examinations was obtained by using formula and comparing them with the DRL from MOH. The average dose equivalent of intra-and extra-oral radiographic examination is lower than the ICRP dose limit. The doses derived from both examinations did not exceed the prescribed levels when compared with DRL. The doses calculated for intra-oral examination of molar maxillary, molar mandibular and interproximal (bitewing) was 0.880 mGy while periapical examination of the anterior maxillary and mandibular was 0.688 mGy and occlusal examination was 1.100 mGy. For the panoramic examination the dose was 0.011 mGy.m2 while lateral cephalometric examination was 0.0054 mGy.m2. The doses obtained from this study were within the dose limit and predetermined level. This shows that a patient receives the minimum dose for both dental radiographic examinations with the optimum level of safety which meets the ALARA concept. © 2017 Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
publisher Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
issn 1287680
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1828987879620083712