Aerodynamic properties comparison between natural feather, nylon, and synthetic shuttlecocks

This study compared the aerodynamic properties between the natural feather, nylon, and foam shuttlecocks under various pitch angles, α using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) during steady-state flight conditions. The velocity varied within 10–60 m/s and α =10°, 20°,30°. The drag coefficient for fe...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
发表在:International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation
主要作者: 2-s2.0-105000393076
格式: 文件
语言:English
出版: Inderscience Publishers 2025
在线阅读:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105000393076&doi=10.1504%2fIJESMS.2025.142974&partnerID=40&md5=49acc9191ab8505ef583c36a6ea65d83
id Rasid D.A.; Remeli M.F.; Singh B.; Moria H.
spelling Rasid D.A.; Remeli M.F.; Singh B.; Moria H.
2-s2.0-105000393076
Aerodynamic properties comparison between natural feather, nylon, and synthetic shuttlecocks
2025
International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation
16
1
10.1504/IJESMS.2025.142974
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105000393076&doi=10.1504%2fIJESMS.2025.142974&partnerID=40&md5=49acc9191ab8505ef583c36a6ea65d83
This study compared the aerodynamic properties between the natural feather, nylon, and foam shuttlecocks under various pitch angles, α using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) during steady-state flight conditions. The velocity varied within 10–60 m/s and α =10°, 20°,30°. The drag coefficient for feather/foam was approximately constant at 0.56. Other aerodynamic properties including the lift and moment coefficients were also investigated. The lift coefficient obtained for nylon and feather/foam were 0.38 and 0.30 at α = 30° (30 m/s). All models had shown a negative sign for the moment coefficient, which indicates the aerodynamic centre is always behind the centre of gravity. Therefore, it will give stability to the shuttlecock during the flight. The nylon shuttlecock showed a higher drag coefficient compared to others due to its larger gap area and an increased wake behind the shuttlecock. Copyright © 2025 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
Inderscience Publishers
17559758
English
Article

author 2-s2.0-105000393076
spellingShingle 2-s2.0-105000393076
Aerodynamic properties comparison between natural feather, nylon, and synthetic shuttlecocks
author_facet 2-s2.0-105000393076
author_sort 2-s2.0-105000393076
title Aerodynamic properties comparison between natural feather, nylon, and synthetic shuttlecocks
title_short Aerodynamic properties comparison between natural feather, nylon, and synthetic shuttlecocks
title_full Aerodynamic properties comparison between natural feather, nylon, and synthetic shuttlecocks
title_fullStr Aerodynamic properties comparison between natural feather, nylon, and synthetic shuttlecocks
title_full_unstemmed Aerodynamic properties comparison between natural feather, nylon, and synthetic shuttlecocks
title_sort Aerodynamic properties comparison between natural feather, nylon, and synthetic shuttlecocks
publishDate 2025
container_title International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation
container_volume 16
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1504/IJESMS.2025.142974
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105000393076&doi=10.1504%2fIJESMS.2025.142974&partnerID=40&md5=49acc9191ab8505ef583c36a6ea65d83
description This study compared the aerodynamic properties between the natural feather, nylon, and foam shuttlecocks under various pitch angles, α using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) during steady-state flight conditions. The velocity varied within 10–60 m/s and α =10°, 20°,30°. The drag coefficient for feather/foam was approximately constant at 0.56. Other aerodynamic properties including the lift and moment coefficients were also investigated. The lift coefficient obtained for nylon and feather/foam were 0.38 and 0.30 at α = 30° (30 m/s). All models had shown a negative sign for the moment coefficient, which indicates the aerodynamic centre is always behind the centre of gravity. Therefore, it will give stability to the shuttlecock during the flight. The nylon shuttlecock showed a higher drag coefficient compared to others due to its larger gap area and an increased wake behind the shuttlecock. Copyright © 2025 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
publisher Inderscience Publishers
issn 17559758
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1828987859263029248