Comparing effectiveness of high-fidelity human patient simulation vs case-based learning in pharmacy education

Objective. To determine whether human patient simulation (HPS) is superior to case-based learning (CBL) in teaching diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and thyroid storm (TS) to pharmacy students.; Design. In this cross-over, open-label, single center, randomized control trial, final-year undergraduate phar...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
المؤلف الرئيسي: 2-s2.0-84908299218
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:English
منشور في: American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy 2014
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84908299218&doi=10.5688%2fajpe788153&partnerID=40&md5=759c6cd5c5c015da5996f1a0413f6772
الوصف
الملخص:Objective. To determine whether human patient simulation (HPS) is superior to case-based learning (CBL) in teaching diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and thyroid storm (TS) to pharmacy students.; Design. In this cross-over, open-label, single center, randomized control trial, final-year undergraduate pharmacy students enrolled in an applied therapeutics course were randomized to HPS or CBL groups. Pretest, posttest, knowledge retention tests, and satisfaction survey were administered to students.; Assessment. One hundred seventy-four students participated in this study. The effect sizes attributable to HPS were larger than CBL in both cases. HPS groups performed significantly better in posttest and knowledge retention test compared to CBL groups pertaining to TS case (p,0.05). Students expressed high levels of satisfaction with HPS sessions.; Conclusion. HPS was superior to CBL in teaching DKA and TS to final-year undergraduate pharmacy students. © 2014, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. All right reserved.
تدمد:29459
DOI:10.5688/ajpe788153