Diversity selection of compounds based on 'protein affinity fingerprints' improves sampling of bioactive chemical space

Diversity selection is a frequently applied strategy for assembling high-throughput screening libraries, making the assumption that a diverse compound set increases chances of finding bioactive molecules. Based on previous work on experimental 'affinity fingerprints', in this study, a nove...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
发表在:Chemical Biology and Drug Design
主要作者: 2-s2.0-84882787252
格式: 文件
语言:English
出版: 2013
在线阅读:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84882787252&doi=10.1111%2fcbdd.12155&partnerID=40&md5=4999a6863c8d20c29853a6f02ad8b77f
id Nguyen H.P.; Koutsoukas A.; Mohd Fauzi F.; Drakakis G.; Maciejewski M.; Glen R.C.; Bender A.
spelling Nguyen H.P.; Koutsoukas A.; Mohd Fauzi F.; Drakakis G.; Maciejewski M.; Glen R.C.; Bender A.
2-s2.0-84882787252
Diversity selection of compounds based on 'protein affinity fingerprints' improves sampling of bioactive chemical space
2013
Chemical Biology and Drug Design
82
3
10.1111/cbdd.12155
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84882787252&doi=10.1111%2fcbdd.12155&partnerID=40&md5=4999a6863c8d20c29853a6f02ad8b77f
Diversity selection is a frequently applied strategy for assembling high-throughput screening libraries, making the assumption that a diverse compound set increases chances of finding bioactive molecules. Based on previous work on experimental 'affinity fingerprints', in this study, a novel diversity selection method is benchmarked that utilizes predicted bioactivity profiles as descriptors. Compounds were selected based on their predicted activity against half of the targets (training set), and diversity was assessed based on coverage of the remaining (test set) targets. Simultaneously, fingerprint-based diversity selection was performed. An original version of the method exhibited on average 5% and an improved version on average 10% increase in target space coverage compared with the fingerprint-based methods. As a typical case, bioactivity-based selection of 231 compounds (2%) from a particular data set ('Cutoff-40') resulted in 47.0% and 50.1% coverage, while fingerprint-based selection only achieved 38.4% target coverage for the same subset size. In conclusion, the novel bioactivity-based selection method outperformed the fingerprint-based method in sampling bioactive chemical space on the data sets considered. The structures retrieved were structurally more acceptable to medicinal chemists while at the same time being more lipophilic, hence bioactivity-based diversity selection of compounds would best be combined with physicochemical property filters in practice. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

17470285
English
Article

author 2-s2.0-84882787252
spellingShingle 2-s2.0-84882787252
Diversity selection of compounds based on 'protein affinity fingerprints' improves sampling of bioactive chemical space
author_facet 2-s2.0-84882787252
author_sort 2-s2.0-84882787252
title Diversity selection of compounds based on 'protein affinity fingerprints' improves sampling of bioactive chemical space
title_short Diversity selection of compounds based on 'protein affinity fingerprints' improves sampling of bioactive chemical space
title_full Diversity selection of compounds based on 'protein affinity fingerprints' improves sampling of bioactive chemical space
title_fullStr Diversity selection of compounds based on 'protein affinity fingerprints' improves sampling of bioactive chemical space
title_full_unstemmed Diversity selection of compounds based on 'protein affinity fingerprints' improves sampling of bioactive chemical space
title_sort Diversity selection of compounds based on 'protein affinity fingerprints' improves sampling of bioactive chemical space
publishDate 2013
container_title Chemical Biology and Drug Design
container_volume 82
container_issue 3
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cbdd.12155
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84882787252&doi=10.1111%2fcbdd.12155&partnerID=40&md5=4999a6863c8d20c29853a6f02ad8b77f
description Diversity selection is a frequently applied strategy for assembling high-throughput screening libraries, making the assumption that a diverse compound set increases chances of finding bioactive molecules. Based on previous work on experimental 'affinity fingerprints', in this study, a novel diversity selection method is benchmarked that utilizes predicted bioactivity profiles as descriptors. Compounds were selected based on their predicted activity against half of the targets (training set), and diversity was assessed based on coverage of the remaining (test set) targets. Simultaneously, fingerprint-based diversity selection was performed. An original version of the method exhibited on average 5% and an improved version on average 10% increase in target space coverage compared with the fingerprint-based methods. As a typical case, bioactivity-based selection of 231 compounds (2%) from a particular data set ('Cutoff-40') resulted in 47.0% and 50.1% coverage, while fingerprint-based selection only achieved 38.4% target coverage for the same subset size. In conclusion, the novel bioactivity-based selection method outperformed the fingerprint-based method in sampling bioactive chemical space on the data sets considered. The structures retrieved were structurally more acceptable to medicinal chemists while at the same time being more lipophilic, hence bioactivity-based diversity selection of compounds would best be combined with physicochemical property filters in practice. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
publisher
issn 17470285
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1828987883551195136